Home

Features

Archive

Scholarships

Subscribe

Advertise

Contact us

Links


Home

 

Archive Contents

Parasites in cattle

Over the past several months, we have discussed several issues that hopefully assisted producers as they made feeding decisions for their cattle herd. With spring just around the corner, I hope that each of you can now see light at the end of the tunnel and are preparing for what will hopefully be a good growing season.

With the lack of hay this past winter, I am seeing some cattle that are in fair body condition that will need extra nutrition to breed back this spring. There is a direct correlation between body condition scores and breed back time for brood cows. With this in mind, I would like to encourage you to consider an external and internal parasite control program for early spring.

Several University studies have indicated that cattle carrying a high count of internal parasites will have lower body condition scores and will have longer breed back times than cows that have been maintained on a regular scheduled parasite control program. It is even more imperative this spring due to the circumstances from the last few months.

First of all, I have talked to several producers who did not work their cattle last fall due to cost factors. These producers were preparing to spend money for extra feed and hay and did not spend it on parasite control.

Another reason to expect a high worm count is due to cattle grazing very close to the ground as producers were stretching forages, along with the fact that the early winter was mild and wet. Internal parasites are found close to the ground and not in the top of taller grasses.

A third reason for a spring parasite program is to improve body condition scores on cattle. A high internal parasite count will rob cattle of needed nutrition for improving body condition and allowing breeding back in a timely fashion.

A final reason is external parasites. I have had more calls and seen more severe cases of lice than I have in the past 10 years. While external parasites may not rob the cow of needed nutrition, it will stress the animal to the point that it will not want to graze.

Now that we have established a need for a parasite control program, let’s look at the kind of program we should implement. Over the past few years, a large number of generic parasite control products have come on the market. These products are priced reasonably and a lot of producers are using them in place of branded products such as Eprinex, Dectomax and Ivomec. While this market has grown, let’s consider some facts before deciding to use a generic product.

For the most part generic products can be made at a variety of places around the world with no quality control standards in place. These products can be mixed in a variety of ways with different active ingredient carriers and all they have to guarantee is that the active ingredient is in the product. These manufacturers have conducted very little, if any, research as to the effectiveness of their product against a branded product. I can also document several large producers in Alabama that used the generic products and have gone back to branded products because of the ineffectiveness of the generic products.

Another factor against the use of generics is the inconsistency of the product. Several producers have mentioned the fact that the product will be inconsistent in color and odor. This is due directly to the fact that these manufactures do not guarantee a specific carrier for the active product. In most cases, it’s a type of alcohol that will be adversely affected by temperature and other environmental conditions.

A third concern is that you, as a producer, have little recourse if a problem arises. Nationally recognized drug companies such as Merial, Pfizer, and Intervet have veterinarians and field staff on board to assist you if a problem arises. These companies will send a representative to your farm and will make sure that there is not a problem with their product. If a problem arises on the generic side, you are pretty much on your own when it comes to deciding a course of action.

A final reason that I would recommend a branded product is because of their support of the cattle industry. It is imperative that we help industries that are dedicated to helping our industry. These companies will support us through research, national advertising, and marketing of our cattle. I recently had the opportunity to visit the National Cattleman’s Associations Trade Show. As I looked at the different companies that were giving support to the cattle industry, it was pretty obvious that it was the national companies that we hear about each day.

I realize that it is easy to use a generic product based on cost. I would encourage you to look at it in another way. Would you trust your car to gas and oil that you knew little about? Would you consider taking a drug that had little research and recourse if a problem arose? Cattle are our business and we need to do the very best possible job in assuring that they operate at their most productive level.

A branded product such as Eprinex will cost you an additional $2.00 per head to utilize. For this $2.00 you will get a product that is pharmaceutical grade with years of research and financial backing to guarantee you a consistent product with consistent results. You will also get a company that will stand behind its products and will support our industry as we continue to make sure that beef is the product of choice. While I realize that it is more costly, I will gladly pay an additional $2.00 per head to make sure that I am giving my cattle the very best product to control parasites this spring. Plus, how much are you saving if you have to retreat to control the parasites and the loss of production due to missing your breed back time?

If you have any questions or would like additional information, please feel free to contact me at me at jimmyh@alafarm.com.

Jimmy Hughes is AFC’s animal nutritionist.

Home

TOP

Archive Contents


COPYRIGHT © 2007 TURNER PUBLISHING CO .,INC., ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Date Last Updated May, 2007